
After hitting the crossbar on the first day of the Royal Ascot meeting, Day 2 was far more enjoyable. While Isla Kai drifted and was too big to be the winner, he ran a blinder for a place. I feel they need to drop him back to 7 furlongs, where his style and stamina may well be best suited. That is twice I have put him up and twice we have collected the place money.
The other first line selection, Rebel Territory, was a non-runner, so we needed to use a replacement, as advised. What a fall-back option it turned out to be, as Dark Shift won! He was available at 10/1, using best odds at Bet365 at the time of writing, but backed down to 5/1 on the day. His victory means that he is now four from six at the track.
For those who also read the overview of the other races, there was another winner, Eldar Eldarov, who demonstrated the fine line between hero and zero in racing!
Heading into Day 4, I will not go over the track details, but just remind you there are 33 previous winners in our data set, as we discount the one year the meeting was held at York. Today, we are going to look at another crazy, large field Handicap and once again try to find the needle in the haystack.
However, this time there are just 19 runners declared, so it should be an easier task, right? Well, it’s probably not!!!!
We again will discount 2005 and review 33 renewals, as there has not been a major change in the winner’s profile since 1988.
The previous 33 winners were aged four years (x 21), five years (x 8), six years (x 3, the last being Zaralaska in 1997) or seven years (x 1, Scarlet Dragon in 2020).
All previous winners carried between 7-09 and 9-10 (in 1988). Given that featherweights are no longer allowed, we will focus on those carrying between 08-10 and 09-10.
Twenty of the 33 previous winners were sent off at odds of 10/1, or less and eight Favourites have prevailed, with six winning in the last ten years.
A further ten winners were returned at odds between 11/1 and 20/1, with just three between 25/1 and 33/1, the last being Scarlet Dragon in 2020.
Therefore, it pays to concentrate on those priced at 20/1, or less, but looking more closely at the top end of the market, including the Favourite.
So, the Trends for this race indicate we are looking for a young, improving sort, ideally with previous form at the Royal Ascot meeting or at least at the track.
I will firstly discount those runners who are too old to meet the Trends:
Next, I will remove any runner who has been off the track for more than 50 days:
Lastly, any of the remaining runners who did not place in the top three on their last start will now be eliminated:
We are now left with six remaining horses to review, which I will discuss in race card order.
Mashoor has travelled over from Ireland, having won comfortably last time out. He is stepping up in trip here, but given the ease with which he dispatched the field in his last race, I’m not too concerned with his stamina. What does put me off selecting him is his draw in Stall 1, which has not supplied the winner since Son of Sharpshot in 1995. That particular horse is a favourite of mine, as he was my fourth winner the very first time I filled a Lucky 15!
Just Fine ticks every box except the draw again, as he been allotted Stall 7. If he was in a double-figure draw, he would be my selection without doubt, as he ran in the King George last year and warmed up with an excellent run at York. He is the Queen’s best chance of a Jubilee year winner at Royal Ascot this week, but that draw is a big concern. To add to the considerations, the last single draw winner was supplied by Sir Michael Stoute in 2008, so maybe, just maybe, especially with six of the last ten winners being Favourites?
Stay Well has been allotted Stall 2 and while he has run well this year, I fear the places are the best he can hope for from that position. He has run well at the course, but I also see him priced as high as 25/1 in places (although others are as low as 16/1) but for those reasons I will have to discount him.
Brilliant Light is another Trends qualifier who has a low draw, having been allotted Stall 4. He wintered in Meydan, running decent races there before returning to win at Ripon. He had dropped to a favourable mark on that day, but while he won on Good To Firm going, I feel he outclassed his rivals in a Class 3 Handicap. A comment by Hector Crouch in 2020 that he would not want to be running anywhere with “firm in the description” combined with his draw means I will have to discount him. I also think he will drift and will be too big a price to be the selection.
Contact was beaten first time out by Get Shirty over this distance, form which has been franked this week in no uncertain terms, as that one beat the Ballydoyle hotpot, Cleveland, on Day 1. The ground that day was soft and would not have suited, as he came out and has won twice since on faster ground, the last time a shade cosily. On a line through Forza Orta, I think he is just going to come out on top of Just Fine. Added to that, his jockey, Ben Curtis, has a hit rate of 19% for all rides, so Contact looks the better option at double the odds.
Cemhaan has improved beyond expectations, if his trainer is to be believed. He won over further last time out and was described as having a nice turn of foot for one who stays so well. My biggest concern here is the form of the yard, who have not had a winner in 45 days, In addition, Cemhaan has been off for 47 days, which is on the cusp of elimination.
I can see why people will back Just Fine who is currently at 7/2, the same SP as three of the last four winners and I would not bet against him. However, his low draw is playing on my mind. I just can't get it out of my thoughts, ignore or dismiss it!
Contact, who has the preferred high draw in Stall 16 and is more closely matched with the Favourite than the market suggests, is the selection, largely due to the draw.
Users must be 18+. If you are having trouble with gambling then help and advice can be found at begambleaware.org. Please Play Responsibly.
Trading financial products carries a high risk to your capital, especially trading leverage products such as CFDs. CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.